# Wednesday, 23 July 2003

Death to the RIAA

 

From The Register:

After issuing a subpoena to the MIT, the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) finds itself in yet another legal battle as university officials have refused to divulge their students' names. MIT is protecting students suspected of trading copyrighted files, citing privacy concerns and improper legal tactics by the RIAA as a defense.“

Even Michael Jackson is concerned about the war on music fans. 'Why do the labels need such aggressive measures in their pursuit of our youth? Why not give universities a bit of time to look after the concerns of their students?'

 

 

Go MIT! I always liked techies from Cambridge. Michael, well you are strange, but you are correct this time. J

 

The RIAA must die. The RIAA is pure evil. They are anti-technology dinosaurs. They would rather litigate away the internet than embrace it as a new business model. They screw the artists and the consumers. This is why I openly violate all copyright laws and download MP3s to my heart's content. I am practicing civil disobedience with each download.

 

So RIAA, how can you stop me? On the techie front, you just can't, sorry. I am way too smart for you. (And when I am no longer smarter than you I have friends who are way smarter than me!) I can make my IP Address look like Saddam Hussein's. You can't shut down my ISP and I don't attend a University, so you have nobody to sue. Just try suing me, ha that would be fun. I have Tom Howe as my lawyer!

 

Oh wait. You can stop me. You can stop suing ISPs, Universities, etc and work with the artists and the technology industry to come up with a way to monetize MP3 distribution. You can't fight technology (Just ask the Peoples Republic of China and Google). Wishing that there was no file sharing and the internet is not going to make it go away. I am more than willing to pay THE ARTIST for each MP3 that I download. Where does that leave the RIAA. Hopefully in hell where they belong.

 

posted on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 14:45:14 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [22] Trackback
# Tuesday, 22 July 2003

Sites Switching from Linux to Windows Server 2003

From Wininformant:


As was the case shortly after the release of Windows 2000 a few years back, the release of Windows Server 2003 this April has triggered a raft of defections to the new operating system, many of which are coming from an unexpected place: Linux. According to Web monitoring firm Netcraft, the number of active Web sites based on Windows Server 2003 has jumped 300 percent since its launch, and the OS now powers almost 90,000 Web sites. 42 percent of these sites are new sites, 43 were upgrades from other Windows Server versions (primarily Win2K), and 5 percent migrated from Linux. In the wake of Apple's Switch campaign failure, it's nice to see someone actually switching. To something.

posted on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 13:42:38 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [19] Trackback

Open Letter to Radio Userland

My comments don't work and there is no reason why. One day about 10 days ago they stopped working. I have emailed customer support about a week ago and am still waiting to hear from them. This is clearly unacceptable.

If anyone has a solution, please email me. If anyone has a blog with better customer support, please email me.

posted on Tuesday, 22 July 2003 07:45:41 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [21] Trackback
# Monday, 21 July 2003

Ich Bein Ein Aushlander

 

I love the city of Munich (Sorry Clemens, I know you don’t like that part of Germany). I go there usually twice a year. My good friend Nicole and her awesome hubby Chris live there. Being the History Major, etc I love the history all over Munich, even though it is bad history since the Hofbrahaus was the scene of one of the most important events leading up to Nazism and World War II.

 

I love the UBhan and SBhan. I love the surfer chicks (I can't resist them!!). I love the proximity to the Alps. Five hours by train to Venice. I love the 1/2 beer 1/2 Lemonade drink in the beer garden. Ok, I will stop now on how cool it is there.

 

What I don’t love about Munich is the bad business decisions.  On May 28, 2003, the city of Munich, Germany, voted to migrate its Windows desktops to Linux. (Sheer coincidence- I happened to be there on vacation that day.) Microsoft came in before this decision and offered Windows at a deep discount. Munich wanted to make a statement and threw common sense out the window. Before you Linux people revive stephenforteFUD.com, remember I am not a religious fanatic on this issue. I make my techie decisions based on finances and TCO. So here is why Munich’s decision is a poor one (from the RD alias):

 

From: Vinod Unny

Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 12:58 AM
To: MSDN RD List
Subject: [msdnrd] RE: USA Today Article about the largest Linux desktop deployment

 

Just some new news I saw regarding this. Extremely funny and interesting:

From: http://www.wininformant.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=39614

---------------------------------------------

Fun Fact About Those Linux PCs in Munich
And speaking about Linux stories you don't hear much from the Linux-loving mainstream press, consider the following. Remember that story about the city of Munich choosing Linux to power 14,000 desktop computers? One aspect of this story that most people don't know about is that up to 80 percent of those Linux desktops will be equipped with VMWare, a virtual machine emulator, under which they will run Windows and Windows applications. That's right, folks: The majority of those "Linux desktops" will be used to run … Windows. I'm not a big fan of Gartner, but they've issued a report, correctly titled, "Munich's Choice Doesn't Prove Linux OK for General Desktop Use," that raises some interesting issues. First, many of the Windows desktops they're migrated are very old Windows versions like Windows 3.1, making the switch to Linux less painful (it would be equally painful to switch to XP). Gartner says the cost of switching to Linux will cost 30 million Euros, or 3 million Euros more than it would cost to switch to XP, not including any steep discounts Microsoft would have no doubt provided. And finally, because most of the Linux machines will use VMWare to run Windows anyway, Linux is really being used as a hosting environment, and not as a replacement. In other words, this isn't exactly a good business case on which other companies can base a decision to migrate to Windows desktops. And, not coincidentally, that's why we're not reading about a lot of other high-profile Linux switchers.

------------------------------------------

Also, this seems to be the Garner report he is referring to: http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?doc_cd=115336

With Regards,

 

Vinod Unny
Enterprise InfoTech
Microsoft Regional Director, North India
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

posted on Monday, 21 July 2003 08:32:52 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [10] Trackback
# Sunday, 20 July 2003

NDA, What NDA?

All I can say is that I finally installed the official beta1 of a certain database product. Holy Crap is it cool. This changes everything. Look for my feature article on it in MSDN Magazine soon.

posted on Sunday, 20 July 2003 14:00:11 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [16] Trackback
# Saturday, 19 July 2003

A Serious Brick, but we are no Jan Ullrich..

 

I did a serious brick today with my Teammate Tom Halligan. We did a 20.2 km bike time trial on a very hilly course and I came in at 39:49, then we ran 8.5km in about 45 minutes. While my bike pace was almost 20 mph, just remember that Jan Ullrich did his 60 km time trial yesterday at over a 30 mph pace in the Tour de France yesterday.

posted on Saturday, 19 July 2003 08:25:28 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [6] Trackback
# Friday, 18 July 2003

BillG is $600, 000 Poorer, in only 22 minutes

 

The legendary Carl Franklin spoke at the NYC .NET Developers User Group last night in front of a packed house. It was a night to remember. He did a fabulous job talking about sockets programming and was a real comedian on stage. Carl rocks. Speaking of rocks, Carl and I are going to do a show of .NET ROCKS over lunch one day. How cool is that?

 

After Carl was done, we gave out to all in attendance (150 people) a free copy of Windows 2003 Server, Enterprise Edition, courtesy of Microsoft. Real deal Win 2003 Server. How is that as a benefit of being a member of the User Group?

posted on Friday, 18 July 2003 11:55:53 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [5] Trackback
# Thursday, 17 July 2003

Toy Boy in the House Tonight...

 

Tonight the legendary Carl Franklin will be speaking at the NYC .NET Developers User Group. In addition to the free Pizza, we will also have some full blown copies of Windows 2003 Server to give away, courtesy of Microsoft. Sniff sniff, this is our last meeting in the 8th Avenue Microsoft location (we have been meeting there for 7 years or longer), Microsoft NYC is moving a few blocks East next month.

 

Besides being the RD for CT, Carl also hosts .NET ROCKS a very cool radio show (I have been both a guest and a call in before). Carl also loves to jam and makes great audio. My personal favorite is a tune called Toy Boy. You can download the MP3 of Toy Boy from Carl's site. Toy Boy is also the theme song for .NET ROCKS.

posted on Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:26:57 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [15] Trackback
# Wednesday, 16 July 2003

So many ways, so little time

 

Currently working on my VSLive all day .NET Data Access: Soup to Nuts workshop.  Andrew Brust and I will be presenting this on July 31st at the VSLive Conference in New York.

 

It got me thinking. With .NET, Microsoft gives you so many ways to work with transactions.  You can:

  • Program against DTC yourself (and you have to be crazy to do this)
  • Use Enterprise Services
  • Use ADO .NET Transactions
  • Use TSQL Transactions

 

So many transactions, so little time. Well you would never want to use DTC. Period, there is just way too much pluming to deal with. Working with Enterprise Services and creating Serviced Components is quite compelling. There is a fair amount of work involved, so it is only really good when you need a two-phased commit across multiple data sources.

 

Then there is ADO .NET. Not sure why you would ever want to do this either. The SQLClient transaction object is worthwhile, but you would be better of (even if you want to deal with isolation levels) doing your transaction in TSQL. Maybe I am biased against lots of logical code in ADO .NET and rather place the transaction processing inside the TSQL for performance and maintenance reasons. I think that lots of transaction code in ADO .NET leads to very fat code that is also very verbose for no reason. Your middle tier should be thin and fast. Your database is better equipped to handle the transaction. Since ADO .NET limits to one connection, the two are almost the same thing. Now there is always an exception. There are times when ADO .NET is appropriate, I am just searching for it. :)

posted on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 15:56:07 (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #    Comments [6] Trackback